Image with no title

Why did NPR use this headling and this type of phrasing for this article?

1. On Tuesday, May 29 2007, NPR reported a story entitled: Chinatown Resists Gentrification From the article:
  • Shing Wah Yeung is a developer who's worked on several residential projects in Chinatown. ...Yeung brought 61 condos onto the market two years ago, selling at 400-thousand to 1.6 million dollars. More than 90 percent of the buyers, he says, were Chinese-American. So even when new apartments come online, the racial demographics of Chinatown don't change.
  • The lofts are selling for 1.6 million up to 5 million dollars for the penthouses.
  • Gary Tai points to a six-story building, owned by the Chew Lun Family Association. There's a large Chinese restaurant on the ground floor, and several small businesses above. Tai walks down Mott Street and points out several other buildings owned by the associations. They have 50 in all - about a quarter of the buildings in Chinatown's historic core.
  • I think there is going to be more of a higher-end retail because you have a lot of tourists, there's a lot of traffic on Canal Street.
To some, this sounds like the story of young Asian American professionals who are actively investing in real estate in their community, Chinatown. However, to further drill in the headline "Chinatown Resists Gentrification," the article uses phrases such as:
  • "...one place that appears to be resisting the forces of gentrification."
  • "...Chinatown's been resistant to gentrification."
  • "...these nonprofit groups own real estate, and they're not likely to give it up."
  • "It doesn't appear to have opened up, yet it occupies prime New York real estate."
Why did NPR use this headline and this type of phrasing for this article? Required Question

Survey Software powered by SurveyGizmo
Survey Software